药物重整对尘肺合并慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者慢病管理的效果评价

    Effect Evaluation of Medication Reconciliation on Chronic Disease Management in Patients with Pneumoconiosis Complicated with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

    • 摘要:
      目的 探讨以临床药师为主导的药物重整服务对尘肺合并慢性阻塞性肺病患者慢病管理的效果。
      方法 采用前瞻性随机对照研究设计,选取200例尘肺合并慢性阻塞性肺病患者随机分为干预组(100例)和对照组(100例)。所有入组患者均接受常规检查和治疗,干预组在此基础上增加由临床药师实施提供的药物重整服务。比较两组患者出院后1个月及3个月时的肺功能指标第1秒用力呼气容积(forced expiratory volume in first second,FEV1)占预计值百分比(FEV1%)和6 min步行距离(six minutes walk distance,6MWD)、临床症状评分(CAT和mMRC评分)、用药依从性评分及依从性差的患者比例、出院后3个月内再入院率和药物不良反应发生率以及住院期间相关经济性指标。
      结果 随访期间干预组和对照组脱落率分别为5例(5.00%)和8例(8.00%)。干预组中有51例(51.00%)患者存在至少1个用药偏差。出院后3个月,干预组FEV1%和6MWD水平显著优于入院时(P<0.05),且均明显高于对照组(P<0.05)。干预组出院后1个月及3个月的CAT和mMRC评分较入院时显著性下降(P<0.05),且均明显低于同期对照组(P<0.05)。干预组随访期内再入院率和药物不良发生率显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。干预组出院后1个月及3个月的用药依从性评分较入院时和同期对照组均有显著性提高(P<0.05),且依从性差的患者比例下降幅度明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。此外,两组患者治疗期间的总住院费用、药品费用以及药占比等指标差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。
      结论 临床药师主导的药物重整服务可有效减少尘肺病合并慢性阻塞性肺病患者的用药偏差,显著改善其肺功能和症状控制,提升用药依从性,降低再入院与ADR发生风险,为保障患者用药安全与减轻医疗经济负担提供了有效策略。

       

      Abstract:
      OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness of a clinical pharmacist-led medication reconciliation(MR) service on chronic disease management in patients with pneumoconiosis complicated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD).
      METHODS A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted. A total of 200 patients with pneumoconiosis complicated with COPD were randomly allocated to intervention group(n=100) and control group(n=100). All enrolled patients received routine examinations and treatment, while those in the intervention group additionally received medication reconciliation services implemented by clinical pharmacists. The pulmonary function indicatorspercentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in first second(FEV1%) and six minutes walk distance (6MWD), clinical symptom scores (CAT and mMRC scores), medication adherence scores, the proportion of patients with poor adherence, 3-month readmission rate after discharge, incidence of adverse drug reactions(ADRs), and hospitalization-related economic indicators were compared between the 2 groups at 1 month and 3 months after discharge.
      RESULTS During follow-up, 5(5.00%) and 8(8.00%) patients were lost in the intervention and control groups, respectively. In the intervention group, 51 patients(51.00%) had at least one medication discrepancy. At 3 months post-discharge, FEV1% and 6MWD in the intervention group were significantly improved compared with baseline(P<0.05) and notably higher than those in the control group(P<0.05). The CAT and mMRC scores in the intervention group were significantly reduced at both 1 and 3 months post-discharge compared to admission levels(P<0.05) and were significantly lower than those in the control group at the corresponding time points(P<0.05). The readmission rate and incidence of ADRs during follow-up were significantly lower in the intervention group than in the control group(P<0.05). Medication adherence scores in the intervention group at 1 month and 3 months post-discharge were significantly higher compared with baseline and the concurrent control group(P<0.05), and the proportion of patients with poor adherence decreased more markedly than in the control group(P<0.05). Furthermore, there were statistically significant differences between the two groups in indicators including total hospitalization costs, medication costs and drug-to-cost ratio during treatment(P<0.05).
      CONCLUSION Clinical pharmacist-led MR service can effectively reduce medication discrepancies, significantly improve lung function and symptom control, enhance medication adherence, and lower the risks of readmission and ADRs in patients with pneumoconiosis complicated with COPD. It provides an effective strategy to guarantee patients’ medication safety and reduces the economic burden on the healthcare system.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回