布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗慢性淋巴细胞白血病的快速卫生技术评估

    Rapid Health Technology Assessment of the Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

    • 摘要:
      目的 通过快速卫生技术评估(rapid health technology assessment,rHTA)评价3种布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors,BTKi)治疗慢性淋巴细胞白血病(chronic lymphocytic leukemia,CLL)的临床价值。
      方法 系统检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library等数据库,以及卫生技术评估(health technology assessment,HTA)机构的相关网站和数据库遴选相关研究。由2名研究者独立完成文献筛选、质量评价及数据提取与分析。同时采用半结构化访谈和封闭式问卷调查获取专家建议。最后基于文献证据与调研获得的专家建议,从疗效、安全性、经济性、创新性、适用性和可及性 6 个维度完成全部证据的整合与结果呈现。
      结果 共纳入40项研究,包括17项系统综述/meta分析、13项药物经济学研究和10份HTA报告。在疗效方面,BTKi的无进展生存期和总生存期显著长于化学治疗、免疫治疗及化学免疫治疗方案。其中泽布替尼和阿可替尼可进一步延长CLL患者的无进展生存期。安全性方面,BTKi总体耐受性良好,但更易出现高血压、出血事件和心脏毒性。HTA报告和药物经济学研究提示泽布替尼总用药成本更低,可能较伊布替尼更具成本效益。BTKi作为具有新型作用机制的口服制剂,多数专家认为其适用性优于化学免疫治疗方案。在专家评估的可及性评分中,泽布替尼在3种BTKi中得分最高。
      结论 基于现有有限证据,推荐3种BTKi用于中国CLL患者的治疗,其中泽布替尼在中国更具经济性、安全性和可及性优势,可能为CLL患者带来更大的临床价值。

       

      Abstract:
      OBJECTIVE To evaluate clinical value of three Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors(BTKi) in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia(CLL) using a rapid health technology assessment(rHTA).
      METHODS Systematic retrieval was performed from databases including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, as well as relevant websites and databases of health technology assessment(HTA) agencies to select eligible studies. Then, literature screening, quality assessment, data extraction and analysis were performed independently by two reviewers. Meanwhile, semi-structured interviews and closed-ended questionnaires were conducted to obtain experts’ suggestions and opinions. Finally, integrating the literature derived evidence and expert recommendations obtained from surveys, all evidence was synthesized and results were presented across six dimensions: efficacy, safety, economy, innovation, suitability, and accessibility.
      RESULTS A total of 40 studies were included, including 17 systematic reviews/meta-analyses, 13 economics studies, and 10 HTA reports. In terms of efficacy, the progression-free survival(PFS) and overall survival(OS) of BTKi were significantly longer than chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and chemoimmunotherapy. Zanubrutinib and acalabrutinib could further prolong the PFS of CLL patients. In terms of safety, BTKi were well tolerated, but hypertension, bleeding events, and cardiotoxicity were more likely to be observed. According to the HTA reports and economics studies, zanubrutinib showed a lower total drug cost and potentially offered a greater cost-effectiveness advantage compared to ibrutinib. As oral agents with a novel mechanism of action, BTKi were considered by most experts to be superior to chemoimmunotherapy regimens in terms of applicability. According to the accessibility scores assessed by experts, zanubrutinib achieved the highest score among the three BTKi.
      CONCLUSION Based on the existing limited evidence, three BTKi are recommended for the treatment of CLL in China. Among the three BTKi, zanubrutinib is more economical, safe, and accessible in China, and may be of greater clinical value for CLL patients.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回