头孢他啶阿维巴坦与多黏菌素E对肾功能不全患者的疗效及预后比较

    Comparison of the Efficacy and Prognosis of Ceftazidime-avibactam and Polymyxin E in Patients with Renal Insufficiency

    • 摘要:
      目的  比较头孢他啶阿维巴坦(ceftazidime-avibactam,CAZ-AVI)与多黏菌素E 对肾功能不全患者碳青霉烯类耐药革兰阴性菌(carbapenem resistant gram-negative bacilli,CR-GNB)肺部感染的疗效、安全性及预后。
      方法 选择苏州市立医院收治的CR-GNB肺部感染合并肾功能不全的患者,分为CAZ-AVI组和多黏菌素E甲磺酸钠(polymyxin E methane sulfonate sodium,CMS)组,比较2组性别、年龄、合并症、SOFA评分、APACHE Ⅱ评分、感染类型、感染部位等基础指标,并记录抗CR-GNB治疗疗程、是否联合治疗、联合治疗药物、细菌清除率、是否临床治愈、30 d死亡率及不良反应等资料。
      结果 共纳入161例肾功能不全的CR-GNB肺部感染患者,其中CAZ-AVI组73例,CMS组88例,CAZ-AVI组联合药物治疗比例低于CMS组(76.70% vs 97.73%,P<0.001),临床治愈率、病原菌清除率高于CMS组(56.10% vs 36.40%,P=0.012;71.23% vs 47.72%,P=0.003)。CAZ-AVI组30 d死亡率为39.73%,低于CMS组的60.22%,差异有统计学意义(P=0.010)。CMS组不良反应率高于CAZ-AVI组(60.23% vs 24.66%,P<0.001)。
      结论 CAZ-AVI及多黏菌素E对于肾功能不全患者CR-GNB肺部感染的治疗均具有良好效果。与多黏菌素E相比,CAZ-AVI 临床治愈率及细菌清除率高,安全性和预后较好。

       

      Abstract:
      OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy, safety and prognosis of ceftazidime-avibactam(CAZ-AVI) and polymyxin E in the treatment of carbapenem resistant gram-negative bacilli(CR-GNB) pulmonary infection in patients with renal insufficiency.
      METHODS Patients with CR-GNB pulmonary infection and renal insufficiency admitted to Suzhou Municipal Hospital were selected and divided into the CAZ-AVI group and polymyxin E methane sulfonate sodium(CMS) group. Basic indicators such as gender, age, comorbidities, SOFA score, APACHE Ⅱ score, infection type and infection site were compared between the 2 groups. The treatment course for CR-GNB, whether combined treatment was used, combined treatment drugs, bacterial clearance rate, clinical cure rate, 30-day mortality rate and adverse reactions were recorded.
      RESULTS A total of 161 patients with CR-GNB pulmonary infection and renal insufficiency were included, including 73 in the CAZ-AVI group and 88 in the CMS group. The proportion of combined drug treatment in the CAZ-AVI group was lower than that in the CMS group(76.70% vs 97.73%, P<0.001). The clinical cure rate and pathogen clearance rate in the CAZ-AVI group were higher than those in the CMS group(56.10% vs 36.40%, P=0.012; 71.23% vs 47.72%, P=0.003). The 30-day mortality rate in the CAZ-AVI group was 39.73%, which was lower than 60.22% in the CMS group, and the difference was statistically significant(P=0.010). The adverse reaction rate in the CMS group was higher than that in the CAZ-AVI group(60.23% vs 24.66%, P<0.001).
      CONCLUSION Both CAZ-AVI and polymyxin E have good therapeutic effects on CR-GNB pulmonary infection in patients with renal insufficiency. Compared with polymyxin E, CAZ-AVI has a higher clinical cure rate and bacterial clearance rate, and better safety and prognosis.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回