鲜、生地黄配方颗粒特征图谱及解热作用比较研究

    Comparative Study on Characteristic Chromatogram and Antipyretic Effects of Fresh and Raw Rehmanniae Radix Formula Granules

    • 摘要:
      目的  研究鲜地黄配方颗粒与生地黄配方颗粒的特征图谱以及解热作用的差异。
      方法 采用UPLC分别采集3批鲜地黄配方颗粒与9批生地黄配方颗粒环烯醚萜苷类成分和苯乙醇苷类成分的特征图谱,比较二者特征峰数目的差异;选取SPF级SD大鼠70只,根据基础体温随机分为7组,分别为正常对照组、模型对照组、布洛芬组、生地黄配方颗粒高剂量组、生地黄配方颗粒低剂量组、鲜地黄配方颗粒高剂量组、鲜地黄配方颗粒低剂量组。除正常对照组外,其余各组按100 μg·kg−1腹腔注射脂多糖(lipopolysaccharide,LPS),正常对照组腹腔注射等体积的生理盐水,每隔2 h测1次体温,计算各个监测点体温变化值和体温上升抑制率。
      结果 与鲜地黄配方颗粒特征图谱相比,生地黄环烯醚萜苷类成分特征图谱缺失峰8,苯乙醇苷类成分特征图谱多检出峰9,此2个特征峰可用于鲜、生地黄配方颗粒的专属性鉴别;LPS造模后2、4、6 h,鲜地黄配方颗粒高剂量组均有较显著的解热作用(P<0.05或P<0.01),各配方颗粒样品的大鼠体温上升抑制率比较为鲜地黄配方颗粒高剂量>生地黄配方颗粒高剂量>鲜地黄配方颗粒低剂量>生地黄配方颗粒低剂量,鲜地黄配方颗粒对LPS所致大鼠发热模型的解热作用更优。
      结论 鲜、生地黄配方颗粒特征图谱及解热作用均存在差异,鲜地黄配方颗粒的解热作用更优,研究结果可为鲜地黄配方颗粒的临床推广提供数据支撑。

       

      Abstract:
      OBJECTIVE  To compare the characteristic chromatograms and antipyretic effects between fresh and raw Rehmanniae Radix formula granules.
      METHODS  Collected the characteristic chromatograms of 3 batches of fresh Rehmanniae Radix formula granules and 9 batches of raw Rehmanniae Radix formula granules by using UPLC. Compared the differences of characteristic chromatograms of iridoid glycosides and phenylethanol glycosides in fresh and raw Rehmanniae Radix formula granules. Seventy SPF-grade SD rats were randomly divided into 7 groups based on their basal body temperature, namely, normal control group, model control group, ibuprofen group, high dose group of raw Rehmanniae Radix formula granules, low dose group of raw Rehmanniae Radix formula granules, high dose group of fresh Rehmanniae Radix formula granules, and low dose group of fresh Rehmanniae Radix formula granules. Except for the normal control group, all other groups were injected intraperitoneally with 100 μg·kg−1 lipopolysaccharide(LPS), while the normal control group was injected intraperitoneally with an equal volume of physiological saline. Measured the body temperature every 2 h, calculated the temperature changes and inhibition rate of temperature rise at each monitoring point.
      RESULTS  Compared with the characteristic chromatograms of fresh Rehmanniae Radix formula granules, the peak 8 in the characteristic chromatogram of iridoid glycosides in raw Rehmanniae Radix formula granules was missing, and the characteristic chromatogram of phenylethanol glycosides had an additional peak 9. These two characteristic peaks could be used for the exclusive identification of fresh and raw Rehmanniae Radix formula granules. Injected the LPS for 2, 4 and 6 h later, the high dose fresh Rehmanniae Radix formula granules of group had a significant antipyretic effect(P<0.05 or P<0.01). The inhibition rate of temperature rise in rats with each formula granule sample was compared as follows: high dose of fresh Rehmanniae Radix formula granules>high dose of raw Rehmanniae Radix formula granules>low dose of fresh Rehmanniae Radix formula granules>low dose of raw Rehmanniae Radix formula granules. The antipyretic effect of fresh Rehmanniae Radix formula granules on LPS induced fever model in rats was better.
      CONCLUSION  There are differences in the characteristic chromatograms and antipyretic effects of fresh and raw Rehmanniae Radix formula granules, and the antipyretic effect of fresh Rehmanniae Radix formula granules was better. The research results can provide data support for the clinical promotion of fresh Rehmanniae Radix formula granules.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回