“评分分类法”的建立及在中药注射剂功能主治评价中的应用

    Establishment of “Scoring Classification Method” and Its Application in the Evaluation of Function and Indications of Traditional Chinese Medicine Injections

    • 摘要: 目的 分类讨论中药注射剂功能主治的临床应用,为合理选择中药注射剂提供参考。方法 建立“评分分类法”,分别从影响中药注射剂功能主治选择的8个方面对53种中药注射剂进行评分,分类探讨其功能主治在临床具体选用时存在的问题。结果 53种中药注射剂通过“评分分类”,分值统计在分别为-2分、-1分、0分、2分、3分、4分、5分、6分、7分组,无一中药注射剂有全部加分。其中4分组15个药,数量最多,占比28.30%;<4分的有22个药,占比41.51%;>4分的有16个药,占比30.19%。<0分(包括0分)有5个药;最高评分是7分,有3个药。结论 中药注射剂说明书上缺乏完整的处方规则说明与现代研究,标注项对临床合理选药的指导尚缺乏一定的内容。

       

      Abstract: OBJECTIVE To discuss the clinical application of the function and indications of traditional Chinese medicine injection and to provide reference for rational selection of traditional Chinese medicine injections. METHODS A “scoring classification method” was established to score 53 kinds of traditional Chinese medicine injections in the medical insurance from 8 aspects affecting the selection of indicators. To explore the problems in the specific clinical selection of their functions and indications. RESULTS Fifty-third kinds of traditional Chinese medicine injections were classified according to the “score classification”, and the score statistics were -2 points, -1 points, 0 points, 2 points, 3 points, 4 points, 5 points, 6 points and 7 points respectively. None of the traditional Chinese medicine injections had all the extra points. Among them, there were 4 groups of 15 drugs, with the largest number accounting for 28.30%. There were 22 drugs with a score less than 4, accounting for 41.51%. There were 16 drugs with scores greater than 4, accounting for 30.19%. Five drugs with a score below 0(including 0 points). The highest score was 7, and there were three drugs. CONCLUSION There is a lack of complete prescription rules and modern research on the instructions of traditional Chinese medicine injections, and there is still a lack of content for the guidance of labeling items on clinical rational drug selection.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回