注射用重组人TNK组织型纤溶酶原激活剂对比阿替普酶治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的成本-效果分析

    Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Recombinant Human TNK Tissue-type Plasminogen Activator Injection Versus Alteplase for Treating Acute Ischemic Stroke

    • 摘要:
      目的  从中国医疗卫生体系的角度出发,评估重组人TNK组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(recombinant human TNK tissue-type plasminogen activator,rhTNK-tPA)相比于阿替普酶(alteplase,rt-PA)治疗发病4.5 h内急性缺血性脑卒中(acute ischemic stroke,AIS)需要静脉溶栓的患者的成本效果。
      方法 基于1项中国多中心RCT研究(TRACE-2)构建决策树-马尔可夫模型,模拟周期为3个月,模型结果为AIS患者采用2种溶栓药物的短期和终身的总直接医疗成本和总质量调整生命年(QALYs),据此得到rhTNK-tPA相比于rt-PA的增量成本效果比;并通过单因素敏感性和概率敏感性分析检测模型结果的稳健性。
      结果 成本-效果分析结果显示,rhTNK-tPA和rt-PA组的终身成本分别为136 076元和148 355元,总QALYs分别为6.01和5.95。rhTNK-tPA组的治疗费用较rt-PA组更低且获得的QALYs更高,即rhTNK-tPA相较于rt-PA更具经济性。敏感性分析结果显示,基础分析结果具有稳健性。
      结论 相比rt-PA,对于在发病4.5 h内需要静脉溶栓的AIS患者采用rhTNK-tPA进行溶栓更具成本效果优势。

       

      Abstract:
      OBJECTIVE To assess the cost-effectiveness of recombinant human TNK tissue-type plasminogen activator(rhTNK-tPA) compared to alteplase(rt-PA) for intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke(AIS) patients within 4.5 h of symptom onset, from the perspective of healthcare system of China.
      METHODS Based on the data from a multi-center randomized controlled trial(TRACE-2) in China, a decision tree-Markov model was developed with a cycle length of three months. The model estimated the short-term and lifetime direct medical costs and total quality-adjusted life years(QALYs) for AIS patients receiving 2 thrombolytic agents. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of rhTNK-tPA relative to rt-PA was calculated. One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were conducted to assess the robustness of the model results.
      RESULTS The cost-effectiveness analysis demonstrated that the lifetime costs for patients in the rhTNK-tPA and rt-PA groups were ¥136 076 and ¥148 355, respectively, with corresponding QALYs of 6.01 and 5.95. The rhTNK-tPA group not only incurred lower treatment costs but also achieved higher QALYs, suggesting that rhTNK-tPA was a dominant therapeutic option compared to rt-PA. The deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed the base-case results to be robust.
      CONCLUSION  Compared with rt-PA, rhTNK-tPA is more cost-effective for AIS patients requiring intravenous thrombolysis within 4.5 h of onset.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回