缬沙坦中亚硝胺药物成分相关杂质 (Q)SAR评价及Ames试验研究

    Study on (Q)SAR Evaluation and Ames Test of Nitrosamine Drug Substance-related Impurities in Valsartan

    • 摘要:
      目的  结合基因毒性软件预测和细菌回复突变试验(Ames试验)评价缬沙坦中亚硝胺药物成分相关杂质(nitrosamine drug substance-related impurities,NDSRI)V6-NO的基因突变风险。
      方法 采用CASE Ultra软件对V6-NO进行初步预测和分类,采用标准平板掺入法Ames试验(±S9:10%大鼠肝S9混合液)和预培养法Mini-Ames试验(±S9:30%大鼠肝S9混合液,37 ℃预培养1 h)评价V6-NO的致突变性。
      结果 因V6-NO具有N-亚硝基类警示结构,基于统计学规则模型和专家知识规则模型的预测结果均为阳性,ICH M7分类为第3类,但基于统计学规则的预测结果显示该杂质结构中具有6个失活特征。Ames试验结果显示,在±S9条件下,在标准平板掺入法Ames试验中,V6-NO在每皿62~5000 μg剂量下回复突变菌落数均未超过溶媒对照组的2倍,在预培养法Mini-Ames试验中,V6-NO在每孔62.5~1000 μg剂量下回复突变菌落数也未超过溶媒对照组的2倍,Ames试验和Mini-Ames试验结果均为致突变阴性。
      结论 当NDSRI的软件预测结果为阳性,且与Ames试验结果不一致时,要综合分析和进一步的验证,主要从其结构中存在的活化和失活特征入手,并通过改进Ames试验条件进行验证,全面分析和了解NDSRI的致突变性风险,为药物研发提供有价值的参考信息。

       

      Abstract:
      OBJECTIVE  To evaluate the risk of gene mutation of nitrosamine drug substance-related impurities(NDSRI) V6-NO in valsartan by combining genotoxicity software prediction and bacterial reverse mutation test(Ames test).
      METHODS Classification of V6-NO was firstly predicted by the CASE Ultra software, followed by the evaluation of the mutagenicity of V6-NO by the Ames test using the standard plate incorporation method(±S9: 10% rat liver S9 mixture), as well as by the Mini-Ames test using the pre-incubation method(±S9: 30% rat liver S9 mixture, pre-incubated at 37 ℃ for 1 h).
      RESULTS  Because of the N-nitroso alert structure of V6-NO, the prediction results were positive based on statistical-based model and expert rule-based model, which fell into category 3 of ICH M7 classification, though the prediction results of statistical-based model indicated a total of six deactivating features of impurity structure. Ames test showed that in presence and absence of S9 conditions, the number of revertant colonies of V6-NO at a dose range of 62 μg per plate to 5 000 μg per plate did not exceed 2 times of that vehicle control group using standard plate incorporation method. Similarly, Mini-Ames test showed that the number of revertant colonies of V6-NO at a dose range of 62.5 μg per well to 1 000 μg per well did not exceed 2 times of that vehicle control group using pre-incubation method. Both the Ames test and the Mini-Ames test results of V6-NO were non-mutagenic.
      CONCLUSION  When the prediction result of NDSRI software is positive and inconsistent with the Ames test results, it is necessary to further verify and analyze the results comprehensively, the analysis should incorporate the activating and deactivating feature of the structure of the test compound, followed by improving the Ames test conditions, in order to analyze and understand the mutagenicity risk of NDSRI comprehensively, and provide valuable reference information for drug development.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回