基于药物临床试验登记与信息公示平台和ClinicalTrials.gov的抗真菌药物临床试验现状分析

    Current Status Analysis of Antifungal Drug Clinical Trials Based on the Drug Clinical Trial Registration and Information Disclosure Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov

    • 摘要:
      目的 分析国内外抗真菌药物临床试验的现状及设计特点,为抗真菌药物临床研发提供参考。
      方法 检索中国药物临床试验登记与信息公示平台(www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn)和美国临床试验注册网站(ClinicalTrials.gov),搜集2012年11月1日—2024年3月28日的抗真菌药物临床试验信息,使用WPS Office软件进行信息整理,纳入符合纳排标准的临床试验进行分析。
      结果 中国药物临床试验登记与信息公示平台纳入194项试验,ClinicalTrials.gov纳入196项。与ClinicalTrials.gov相比,中国抗真菌药物注册临床试验现状呈现下述特点:①2018年起试验项目数量逐年上升且生物等效性试验/生物利用度试验增幅显著;②主要研究药物品种少(29 vs 59)且集中,新型抗真菌药物品种少(7 vs 16);③试验中未招募健康受试者占比高(74.19% vs 0.00%)。国内外试验方案设计呈现下述特点:①中国56.25%的侵袭性真菌感染试验使用科学性过高的诊断标准,即EORTC/MSGERC诊断标准;②国内外60%的侵袭性念珠菌、念珠菌血症试验入组前经验用药时限比入组筛选的真菌培养与鉴定时间短;③国内外82.35%侵袭性念珠菌病试验排除了侵袭性深部念珠菌感染。
      结论 实施备案制后,新增临床试验机构促进了中国抗真菌药物临床试验的实施,但仍存在新型抗真菌药物研发不足、健康受试者招募困难等问题。此外,侵袭性真菌感染试验方案中的诊断标准、经验用药时限(侵袭性念珠菌、念珠菌血症试验入组前)、侵袭性深部念珠菌感染也存在完善和深入研究的空间。

       

      Abstract:
      OBJECTIVE  To analyze the current status and design characteristics of antifungal drug clinical trials both domestically and internationally, providing reference for the clinical development of antifungal drugs.
      METHODS Data were collected from the China Drug Clinical Trial Registration and Information Disclosure Platform(www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn) and the ClinicalTrials.gov website for antifungal drug clinical trials registered between November 1, 2012, and March 28, 2024. WPS Office software was used for data organization, and trials meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included for analysis.
      RESULTS A total of 194 clinical trials from the China Drug Clinical Trial Registration and Information Disclosure Platform and 196 trials from ClinicalTrials.gov were included in the analysis. Compared with ClinicalTrials.gov, the current status of registered antifungal drug clinical trials in China exhibited the following characteristics: ①The number of trial projects had increased annually since 2018, with a notable rise in bioequivalence/bioavailability trials; ②There were fewer investigational drug varieties (29 vs 59), and the emergence of new antifungal drug varieties was limited (7 vs 16); ③A higher proportion of ongoing trials requiring recruitment involve healthy participants(74.19% vs 0.00%). The trial design characteristics of domestic and international studies showed the following features: ①In China, 56.25% of trials for invasive fungal infections used overly stringent diagnostic criteria, specifically the EORTC/MSGERC guidelines; ②In both domestic and international studies, 60% of trials for invasive candidiasis and candidemia had a shorter duration of empirical treatment prior to enrollment compared to the time required for fungal culture and identification; ③A substantial 82.35% of trials for invasive candidiasis excluded cases of invasive deep-seated candidiasis.
      CONCLUSION  With the implementation of the registration system, the introduction of new clinical trial institutions has facilitated the conduct of antifungal drug registration trials in China. However, challenges persist, including insufficient research and development of new antifungal drugs and difficulties in recruiting healthy participants. Moreover, there is potential for improvement and further research concerning diagnostic criteria in protocols for invasive fungal infection trial, the duration of empirical treatment prior to enrollment for invasive candidiasis and candidemia trials, and the management of invasive deep-seated candidiasis.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回