缬沙坦治疗慢性肾脏病合并高血压的meta分析及药物经济学评价

    Meta-analysis and Pharmacoeconomics Evaluation of Valsartan in the Treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease with Hypertension

    • 摘要:
      目的  基于meta分析研究缬沙坦治疗慢性肾脏病合并高血压的有效性与安全性,以及开展药物经济学研究,为合理用药提供指导,同时为相关医疗卫生决策提供证据。
      方法 计算机检索PubMed、Embase、The Cochrane Library、中国知网、万方、维普等数据库关于缬沙坦治疗慢性肾脏病合并高血压的文献资料,对其有效性和安全性进行meta分析,并采用增量成本效果比(incremental cost-effectiveness ratio,ICER)进行经济学评价,同时进行敏感性分析。
      结果 共纳入有效文献8篇,包括1586例患者。Meta分析结果显示,相较于硝苯地平控释片单药,缬沙坦联合硝苯地平控释片能改善SBP、DBP和UAER,减少不良反应,且差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。从卫生体系角度出发,以血压值、UAER值和降压有效率为效果指标,药物经济学分析结果显示缬沙坦单药或联合硝苯地平控释片与其他方案比较,ICER<1倍人均可支配收入或效果更佳的同时成本更低。敏感性分析结果与基础分析结果基本一致。
      结论 缬沙坦单药或联合硝苯地平控释片相较于其他药物方案在慢性肾脏病合并高血压治疗中有效性和经济性具有一定优势,且使用缬沙坦联合治疗不良反应发生率降低,安全性更高。但受纳入研究数量和质量限制,上述结论尚需开展更多高质量研究予以验证。

       

      Abstract:
      OBJECTIVE  To study the efficacy and safety of valsartan in the treatment of chronic kidney disease complicated with hypertension based on meta-analysis, and to conduct pharmacoeconomic research, so as to provide guidance for rational drug use and provide evidence for making relevant healthcare decisions.
      METHODS  PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, Weipu and other databases were searched to collect literature on valsartan in the treatment of chronic kidney disease complicated with hypertension, then meta-analysis was conducted, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio(ICER) was used for economic evaluation, and sensitivity analysis were performed.
      RESULTS  A total of 8 valid literatures including 1586 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that valsartan in combination with nifedipine controlled release tablets improved the measures SBP, DBP and UAER, and decreased adverse effects, and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.01), when compared to nifedipine controlled release tablets alone. From the health system perspective, and using the blood pressure value, UAER value, and blood pressure reduction efficiency as the effectiveness indicators, the results of the pharmacoeconomics evaluation showed that valsartan alone or in combination with nifedipine controlled release tablets had an ICER of less than one times per capita disposable income or had better effectiveness with lower costs when compared to other regimens. The results of the sensitivity analysis were basically consistent with the results of the basic analysis.
      CONCLUSION  Compared with other drug regimens, valsartan alone or in combination with nifedipine controlled release tablets has certain advantages in efficacy and economy in the treatment of chronic kidney disease and hypertension, and the probability of adverse reactions caused by the combination treatment of valsartan is decreased and the safety is higher. However, due to limitations in the number and quality of included studies, these conclusions need to be validated by more high-quality studies.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回