化妆品毒理学试验方法的标准比对(Ⅰ)

谢珍; 瞿霖吉; 桑晶; 张霄鹏; 何立成; 康桦; 匡荣<sup>*</sup>

引用本文:	谢珍,瞿霖吉,桑晶,张霄鹏,何立成,康桦,匡荣.化妆品毒理学试验方法的标准比对(Ⅰ)[J].中国现代应用药学,2023,40(10):1422-1428.
	XIE Zhen,QU Linji,SANG Jing,ZHANG Xiaopeng,HE Licheng,KANG Hua,KUANG Rong.Standard Comparison of Toxicological Test Methods for Cosmetics(Ⅰ)[J].Chin J Mod Appl Pharm(中国现代应用药学),2023,40(10):1422-1428.

【打印本页】【HTML】【下载PDF全文】【查看/发表评论】【EndNote】【RefMan】【BibTex】

←前一篇|后一篇→

过刊浏览高级检索

本文已被：浏览 874次下载 600次	码上扫一扫！
分享到：微信更多字体:加大+\|默认\|缩小-
化妆品毒理学试验方法的标准比对(Ⅰ)
谢珍¹, 瞿霖吉¹, 桑晶¹, 张霄鹏², 何立成¹, 康桦¹, 匡荣¹
1.浙江省食品药品检验研究院, 国家药品监督管理局化妆品动物替代试验技术重点实验室, 杭州 310052;2.杭州瑞旭科技集团有限公司, 杭州 310052

摘要:

近年来,我国在化妆品监管和技术领域不断取得进步。在技术标准方面,已建立起化妆品技术法规动态修订机制,以标准化促进化妆品质量提升,带动产业转型升级。本文对毒理学试验方法中的皮肤刺激性/腐蚀性试验、急性眼刺激性/腐蚀性试验的国内、外相关标准情况进行梳理和比对,分析目前标准存在的具体问题并提出建议。

关键词: 化妆品皮肤刺激性/腐蚀性试验急性眼刺激性/腐蚀性试验标准比对

DOI：10.13748/j.cnki.issn1007-7693.20222264

分类号:R991

基金项目:

Standard Comparison of Toxicological Test Methods for Cosmetics(Ⅰ)

XIE Zhen¹, QU Linji¹, SANG Jing¹, ZHANG Xiaopeng², HE Licheng¹, KANG Hua¹, KUANG Rong¹

1.Zhejiang Institute for Food and Drug Control, NMPA Key Laboratory for Animal Alternative Testing Technology of Cosmetics, Hangzhou 310052, China;2.Hangzhou REACH Technology Group Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 310052, China

Abstract:

Recent years have seen continuous progress in cosmetic regulation and technology. In terms of technical standards, a dynamic revision mechanism of cosmetic technical regulations has been established to promote the quality improvement of cosmetics by standardization and to drive the transformation and upgrading of the industry. This paper compares domestic and foreign standards for dermal irritation/corrosion test and acute eye irritation/corrosion test, and analysis the specific problems of the current standards and make recommendations.

Key words: cosmetics dermal irritation/corrosion test acute eye irritation/corrosion test standard comparison